Aid to Africa

Food aid should be continue to sent to Africa in nowadays’s circumstances despite it is not a fundamental solution.
There are many disadvantages of food aid. One of them is the inequality of aid’s distribution. Some countries do not have any effective governments to reach aid. For example, while Somalia and Democratic Republic of Congo could not have aid, Mozambique, Tanzania and Uganda have already been receiving around 50% of their budgets from aid despite they do not need as much as the others. Furthermore, it should be considered that aid creates a dependence on having prepared needs for Africans and sending aid continual does not give a chance them to be encouraged to produce new products. Thus, they have been getting a habit of waiting help without working. When they lose their self-confidence, it is a good state for Western aid donors to set their majority in Africa.
On the other hand, despite all disadvantages of food aid, most of Africans need them to alive. For stopping bigger troubles and mortality that comes from hunger, diseases-HIV/AIDS-, food aid should be continued to sent for a while and in this while the projects should be started to apply like investing in agricultural projects in Africa, giving education to let them to have conscious about lots of things to develop themselves.
As a conclusion, food aid is not a fundamental solution to end poverty in Africa but it should be continued for a while that people have higher life conditions than now with bringing into force projects.