Is poverty necessary?

Unfortunately, poverty is necessary because the economics and money system is only based upon wealthy and poverty, so it means the globalized world is ruled by communism. Despite its being cruel, capitalism is the most suitable monetary system for our world. When we look the opposite side of capitalism we see the socialism but actually socialism did not work When we compare capitalism and socialism we will probably prefer socialism because all people tend to be equal in this system, but in Russian Federation it is tried and it didn’t work. I think the most important reason of not working of socialism is human nature. I read the “Animal Farm”, the allegory of George Orwell’s, and I think the novel is very suitable example for our capitalism and socialism comparison. In Animal Farm, George Orwell explains metaphorically how US’ capitalism Beaten USSR’s socialism. When socialist system starts in the community everybody obeys the rules but after some time passes people change their feelings and thoughts according to their self-benefit and egoistic feelings. In the novel, there is a committee which decides the rules, and after some time passes they add a rule to list: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than the others.” In Animal Farm, Orwell uses animals as the symbol of people living in USSR and from that symbolization he explains the reader that human beings does not worth an equal system because of their nature. In addition, Orwell wants to tell that people always need rulers and pressure makers upon them and that “leaders” of communities always use the other ones according to their self-benefit like in capitalism. In our world, our sources are limited and according to a theory, if rich people number does not increase, poverty will not increase either. In other words wealth of some people makes the others poor.